What to Know About Malpractice Claims for Failure to Monitor Patients

September 10, 2025

A failure to monitor claim arises when a healthcare provider does not track a patient’s condition appropriately, leading to preventable harm. This occurs in many settings, from a hospital recovery room to an emergency department.

Proving these claims requires showing that the provider’s inattention fell below the accepted standard of care and directly caused the injury. While holding a medical facility accountable is a demanding process, our firm helps families secure compensation for the harm they have suffered.

If you have a question about a loved one’s care in a Pennsylvania hospital, call Wapner Newman at (215) 569-0900.

Key Takeaways for Failure to Monitor Malpractice Claims

  • Failure to monitor is a breach of the standard of care. This means a healthcare provider failed to track a patient’s condition as a reasonably prudent professional would, directly causing harm.
  • Proving these claims requires a Certificate of Merit in Pennsylvania. This is a statement from a qualified medical expert confirming the provider’s care fell below the accepted standard, which is a mandatory step in the legal process.
  • Hospitals, not just individual doctors or nurses, are held liable. A facility is responsible for its own negligence, such as understaffing, or for the actions of its staff that lead to a monitoring failure.

What Does a “Failure to Monitor” Actually Look Like?

Common Scenarios We Handle Include:

  • Post-Surgical Complications: A patient is given powerful opioid painkillers after surgery, but the nursing staff does not check their breathing rate frequently. As a result, they suffer from respiratory depression, leading to brain injury or death. This has become a particular focus of litigation in recent years.
  • Ignoring Alarms from Medical Devices: Modern hospitals rely on machines to track heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen levels. When staff become desensitized to these alarms or fail to respond, a patient’s deteriorating condition is missed until it is too late.
  • Failure to Track Fetal Vitals: During labor and delivery, nurses and doctors have a duty to monitor the baby’s heart rate. A failure to notice signs of fetal distress and act on them leads to birth injuries.
  • Not Responding to Worsening Symptoms: A patient in the ER reports a worsening headache or chest pain, but their vital signs are not re-checked for hours. This delay allows a stroke or heart attack to progress untreated. Studies show that monitoring failures contribute to a significant number of avoidable cardiac arrests in hospitals.
  • Inadequate Monitoring in Overcrowded Facilities: During periods of high patient volume, understaffed hospitals may fail to adequately track patients’ conditions, with tragic results.

Why Is Consistent Monitoring a Basic Requirement of Medical Care?

When a patient is in a hospital, they place their trust in the medical team. That trust is based on a legal and ethical principle known as the duty of care. This means the hospital and its staff have an obligation to provide care that meets a certain standard.

The Standard of Care for Patient Monitoring:

  • The standard of care is what a reasonably prudent medical provider would do in a similar situation.
  • Federal regulations, such as the Medicare Conditions of Participation, legally require hospitals to provide ongoing patient assessments and monitoring.

Proper monitoring allows providers to:

  • Detect a problem early: Catching a change in vital signs is the difference between a full recovery and a permanent injury.
  • Assess if a treatment is working: Monitoring shows whether a medication or procedure is having the desired effect.
  • Respond to emergencies: Without consistent monitoring, a crisis becomes a catastrophe.

How Do You Prove a Failure to Monitor Claim in Pennsylvania?

In Pennsylvania, a medical malpractice claim must establish four key elements. A successful case rests on these four pillars.

  • A Duty Was Owed: You must show there was a doctor-patient relationship, which created a duty of care.
  • The Duty Was Breached: This is the core of the claim. We work with medical professionals to show that the level of monitoring provided fell below the accepted standard of care. This is a form of negligence.
  • Causation: The breach of duty must be the proximate cause of the injury. In other words, we have to demonstrate that the harm would not have occurred if the patient had been properly monitored.
  • Damages: You must show that the injury resulted in specific harm, such as additional personal injury medical bills, lost wages, pain, and suffering.

Pennsylvania’s Specific Requirements:

  • The MCARE Act: Pennsylvania’s medical malpractice laws are governed by the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act. This act was designed to ensure patients receive fair compensation when harmed by medical negligence.
  • Certificate of Merit: Under this act, we must file a “certificate of merit” within 60 days of filing the lawsuit. This is a statement from a qualified medical professional confirming that there is a reasonable probability that the care provided fell outside acceptable standards. Our firm handles this entire process.
  • Statute of Limitations: In most cases, you have two years from the date you knew or reasonably should have known about the injury to file a claim. You must act promptly to protect your rights.

Who Is Held Responsible for a Monitoring Failure?

It may not be just one individual. In many cases, multiple parties share legal responsibility for the harm that occurred.

Potentially Liable Parties:

  • Nurses and Nursing Staff: They are on the front lines of patient monitoring and may be held liable for failing to check on patients, document changes, or alert a doctor.
  • Physicians: A doctor may be responsible for ordering an appropriate level of monitoring or for failing to respond when a nurse reports a problem.
  • The Hospital or Medical Facility: In Pennsylvania, hospitals are held directly liable for their own negligence (e.g., understaffing) or through a concept called “apparent agency.” This means if it was reasonable for you to believe a doctor was a hospital employee, the hospital is held responsible for their actions even if they were an independent contractor.

What Compensation Is Available in These Cases?

In Pennsylvania, there are no caps on most types of damages in medical malpractice cases. We pursue the maximum compensation available under the law to cover:

  • Economic Damages:
    • Past and future medical expenses
    • Lost income and diminished earning capacity
    • Rehabilitation and therapy costs
  • Non-Economic Damages:

Questions About Failure to Monitor Claims

What if the medical records don’t show any mistakes?

Poor documentation is sometimes evidence itself. A lack of notes about patient monitoring suggests that it was not performed. We have experience analyzing medical records to find inconsistencies and omissions that support a claim.

Can I still bring a claim if my loved one had a pre-existing condition?

Yes. A healthcare provider has a duty to treat a patient according to their specific health needs. A pre-existing condition does not give them an excuse to provide substandard care or fail to monitor them appropriately.

Is it my word against a doctor’s?

No. These cases are built on evidence from medical records, expert testimony from other medical professionals, and hospital policies. The case is decided by whether the care provided met the accepted medical standard.

Let Us Find the Answers for Your Family

You are right to ask questions when a hospital stay ends in unexpected tragedy. You do not have to find the answers on your own. Our firm focuses on helping families in Pennsylvania handle these difficult situations.

To discuss what happened to your loved one, call the team at Wapner Newman for a free consultation at (215) 569-0900.

Table of Contents

Categories

Archive